Complete Solutions with Advanced Explanations
Correct Pairing:
RE1:
5'─ A A G C T T ─3'
3'─ T T C G A A ─5'
Cuts: Between AA|GCTT (creates 5' overhang: 5'-AA)
RE2:
5'─ G A G C T C ─3'
3'─ C T C G A G ─5'
Cuts: Between GAGC|TC (different overhang)
RE3:
5'─ A A G C T T ─3'
3'─ T T C G A A ─5'
Cuts: Between AA|GCTT (SAME as RE1 - creates same overhang)
Option A (Acetone): CH₃-CO-CH₃
Has 6 α-hydrogens (very acidic). Base easily abstracts H⁺ → forms enolate.
Option B (Carboxylic Acid): CH₃CH₂CH₂COOH
Carboxylic acid hydrogen (COOH) is much more acidic than α-H. Base abstracts from COOH
(pKa ~ 4) not α-H (pKa ~ 20).
Option C (Cyclic Ketone with gem-dimethyl): Cyclohexanone with two CH₃ at one
position
NO α-hydrogen available (both positions occupied by methyl groups). Cannot form enolate.
Option D (Aromatic with amino group): N(CH₃)₂ attached to benzene
ring
The N-methyl hydrogens are NOT α to any carbonyl. The methyl groups directly bonded to
nitrogen have different acidity.
(i) Imidazole: Five-membered ring with 2 nitrogens
Both N have different basicity. One N is more basic than the other.
(ii) Pyrrole: Five-membered aromatic ring with 1 N
N lone pair is part of aromatic system (sp² hybridized). Very weak base. pKa ~ 0-1
(iii) Pyrimidine: Six-membered ring with 2 nitrogens
More electron-deficient than pyridine. Stronger base than pyrrole but weaker than
imidazole.
(iv) Pyridine: Six-membered aromatic ring with 1 N
sp² hybridized N. Lone pair not in aromatic system. Moderate basicity. pKa ~ 5.2
Step 1: Protection
Phenylacetaldehyde + Ethylene glycol + HCl catalyst
→ Forms acetal (cyclic protection of aldehyde)
Structure X: Protected aldehyde as 1,3-dioxolane ring attached to benzyl group
Step 2: Reduction with LiAlH₄
LiAlH₄ is a strong reducing agent that reduces:
- Esters → primary alcohols
- Carboxylic acids → primary alcohols
- Ketones → secondary alcohols
- However, acetals are STABLE to LiAlH₄ (protected group strategy)
Step 3: Hydrolysis
H₂O workup cleaves acetal → regenerates aldehyde → further reduced by excess LiAlH₄ →
primary alcohol
Option A: p-Methoxybenzaldehyde
Electron-donating -OCH₃ group (ortho/para director). Reduces electrophilicity of C=O.
LESS reactive.
Option B: p-Nitrobenzaldehyde
Electron-withdrawing -NO₂ group (ortho/para director). Increases electrophilicity of
C=O. MORE reactive.
Option C: Benzonitrile derivative
Cyano group is electron-withdrawing. Increases electrophilicity. Highly reactive.
Option D: p-Nitrobenzaldehyde variant
Another electron-withdrawing system, comparable to p-nitrobenzaldehyde.
Step 1: Grignard Addition
Cyclohexanone + CH₃CH₂MgBr → 2° alcohol (ethyl group adds to ketone)
Step 2: Dehydration
H₂SO₄ + heat → removes H₂O, forms alkene via elimination
Step 3: Ozonolysis
O₃ cleaves C=C double bond → two carbonyl compounds
Zn/H₂O reduces ozonide to aldehydes/ketones
Expected Products: 1,6-hexanedial (two aldehyde groups) or mixture of ketones/aldehydes depending on alkene position
Given Information:
Neutral M: [Ar]4s²3d⁶ (This is Iron, Fe)
Metal forms Mⁿ⁺ complex with specific d-orbital distribution
Key Considerations:
1. Iron can form Fe²⁺ or Fe³⁺
2. Ligands cause d-orbital splitting (crystal field splitting)
3. Strong field ligands (CN⁻) cause large splitting → pairing
4. Weak field ligands (F⁻, H₂O) cause small splitting → unpaired electrons
Electron Distribution from Diagram:
The diagram shows 3 unpaired electrons in upper orbitals and 3 paired in lower
orbitals
This suggests d⁶ configuration with specific splitting pattern
Since LHL = RHL = 2, the function is continuous at a = 2.
Total set of 3 elements has 2³=8 subsets. Total pairs = 8²=64.
Probability = 27/64.
Combining the equations gives y₁'' + y₁ = 0. Solving with conditions: y₁ = cos x, y₂ = sin x.
If f³(x) is the identity function, then f must have an inverse (f²). Any function with an inverse is both one-one and onto.
Critical point at sin x = 1 (x = π/2). Since g(u) = u + 1/u has a minimum at u = 1 for positive u, f(x) has a local minimum at π/2.
If the net signed area is zero, the function must cross the x-axis or touch it within [0, 1].
Expression simplifies to |(1 + 2i)¹⁵|² = (1² + 2²)¹⁵ = 5¹⁵.
If λ is eigenvalue of A, (λ-2) is eigenvalue of A-2I. Using Cayley-Hamilton and determinant property gives 5.
At the jump discontinuity (x=1), the local average of the indicator function is exactly half the step height.
Physical Principle:
When magnet falls through conducting loop, changing magnetic flux induces
current in loop. This current creates magnetic field opposing the motion (Lenz's
Law) → Magnetic damping
Analysis:
Magnet A & B: Falling magnets induce currents in copper loop →
Experience upward magnetic force opposing motion → Slower fall → Longer time
Bar C (Non-magnetic): No magnetic field → No induced current → No magnetic damping → Falls freely under gravity alone → Faster fall → Shorter time
Magnets A vs B:
If both have same strength, they experience same damping force → Same fall time
Circuit Configuration:
Series RC circuit (resistor then capacitor to ground). AC input signal
across R+C.
Transfer Function:
Vout/Vin = 1/√(1 + (ωRC)²) at -45° phase shift
When Vout/Vin = 1/√2: This occurs at cutoff frequency fc
Cutoff Frequency Condition:
1/√2 = 1/√(1 + (2πfcRC)²)
Solving: fc = 1/(2πRC)
Calculation:
C = ¼ pF = 0.25 × 10⁻¹² F = 2.5 × 10⁻¹³ F
RC = 1000 × 2.5 × 10⁻¹³ = 2.5 × 10⁻¹⁰
fc = 1/(2π × 2.5 × 10⁻¹⁰) ≈ 6.4 × 10⁸ Hz ≈ 1.6 × 10⁶ Hz (order of
magnitude)
Force Analysis:
Electron (negative charge) experiences upward force in downward E
field:
F = eE (upward, opposite to field direction)
Acceleration:
a = F/me = eE/me (upward)
Motion Components:
Horizontal: Uniform motion with vx = v cos θ
Vertical: Uniformly accelerated motion with ay = +eE/me
(upward!)
Trajectory Type:
Parabolic path curving upward (opposite to gravity case)
Possible Trajectories:
A: Curves upward significantly
B: Curves upward slightly
C: Curves downward
Depending on E field strength and angle θ